North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Email peering

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Mon Jun 20 07:12:58 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lE1xJlnh5MA8c6mVdoFdU0EqZ/VrDl76JR49QMvHHyu5wYmQamPJt/hLwfNShihT/4EArOily+L6EzNo+9HwWHPBNoQvo8UmYqMmjJiKXLfzEm+xwlKwRNiuJPN1mjm0R2auCWBAUUZfriGeA0LJcFv7ueMMQ8ua2QHt4k+eSxE=
On 19/06/05, Alexei Roudnev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> My e-mail is [email protected], but I send it when I am on DSL with EthLink
> (and thru Earthlink SMTP). And it is 100% valid situation.
> 

Sure is - which is one reason why spf just is not going to work for you
CSV on the other hand makes no claim about the sender - it looks at
the sending host