North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area)

  • From: Henry Linneweh
  • Date: Wed Jun 08 23:05:22 2005

I did notice A low number on the index at


--- Joel Perez <[email protected]> wrote:
> [ SNIP ]
> >I think that these things are operational and
> belong here. Its'
> >the level that ras is talking about and the
> content. Saying 
> >MCI has a massive fiber cut impacting 230 Congress
> IX vs. 
> >GBLX is not doing what I demand are very different
> types of
> >outage posts.
> My original post to the list contained nothing about
> any services I
> expect with provider xxx. I asked if anybody else
> saw packet loss or
> congestion.
> My follow-up posts contained the reason as to why I
> was posting this to
> the list instead of to my provider, I then took it
> off-list with 2 other
> posters and managed to get more info out of them
> then out of GBLX. I try
> not to bash anybody because I know that doesn't
> really resolve anything
> most of the time.
> >I'd like to see the higher level stuff we used to
> do and have some
> >sort of information along with it vs. "i see a
> packet drop in XYZ".
> >A prefix or something. That usually makes people go
> look.
> I agree, it totally slipped my mind to provide that
> info. I just typed
> up a quick post and sent it out.
> Im my humble opinion I think this is Nanog content
> and that is why I
> posted it. Most posters opinion of what is and what
> isn't appropriate
> content varies. I love my delete key, if I don't
> think it's appropriate
> I delete it. No harm done to me. 
> To each his own I guess. 
> Thanks to those that responded.