North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: 192.169.0.0

  • From: Randy Bush
  • Date: Sat Jun 04 00:27:48 2005 
> more grist for your mill:
> 
> route-server>sho ip route | inc 192.169
> B       66.192.169.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.9, 7w0d
> B    192.169.41.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 17:33:51
> B    192.169.38.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
> B    192.169.4.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 2w4d
> B    192.169.39.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.102, 6d16h
> B    211.192.169.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.9, 2d16h
> B    192.169.35.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
> B    192.169.2.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 2w4d
> B    192.169.3.0/24 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 2w4d
> B    192.169.40.0/23 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 17:33:58
> B    192.169.36.0/23 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
> B    192.169.0.0/16 [200/0] via 168.215.52.102, 7w0d
> B    192.169.32.0/22 [200/0] via 168.215.52.71, 6d07h
> route-server>sho ip int bri
> Interface                  IP-Address      OK? Method Status
> Protocol
> FastEthernet0/0            66.162.47.58    YES manual up
> up
> Loopback0                  unassigned      YES NVRAM  up
> up
> 
> TWT has a route-server (from traceroute.org's listings) note the age of
> this route:
> B    192.169.0.0/16 [200/0] via 168.215.52.102, 7w0d

i don't get it.  this is supposed to be a good thing.

am i supposed to just announce the 200+ /8s that cover the
net, figuring anyone who has space will announce their
longer prefix?

tricky stuff sits and waits to backfire on one.  so the
older and lazier of us tend to play as close to the
straight and narrow as we can to get the job done.

randy