North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
Joe Abley wrote:
I thought that loose-mode uRPF is what was recommended for any connected entity that is multi-homed. And that makes sense.On 2005-06-03, at 10:26, Andre Oppermann wrote:[email protected] wrote:I guess it's been a while since I've played with it, but isn't this pretty
What happened to that? Whats next? uRPF in core?
At which point do we stop breaking things?
There must be a safe way to solve the problem of spoofing routed space without breaking multi-homing.