North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Tue May 31 22:59:48 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TVpzDz/nf5emzHKdDcpvGw7EuKyaufVW2t9V65b8oqeN5pmYfGr187/0S1K63aQTdRwrzmi9GOltcpjL3WT/nOWgy/P/UwFfeN1BOtZn3c8fxs51gJxcDtYWvB+CjHSuG9PTDEFWNQNtNPMjddVG7f8U+8b/20J8mZG0hQzg5uM=
On 31/05/05, Rich Kulawiec <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 05:24:41PM -0700, Crist Clark wrote:
> > It appears VerizonWireless.com has some rather aggressive mail filters.
> 
> Verizon is hopelessly clueless when it comes to mail system operations
> and mail filters -- as evidenced by their ongoing decision to deliberately
> provide anonymizing spam support and DoS attack services to anyone clever

Interesting rant, if one that I've heard before often enough, given
some spam-l posters'  current obsession with "outscatter"

Anyway, you're ranting about Verizon.  The OP has a problem with
Verizon Wireless, which seems a completely separate outfit, with a
different mail farm, different admins and postmasters (and different
corporate hierarchy upto a point - certainly different wrt operational
issues)

If you have operational rants about Verizon Wireless, fine.  Else,
please leave the ranting for rants sake for spam-l or nanae.  Makes
interesting reading there I guess, but I dont see much use for it on
nanog.

-srs