North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: VZ and VZW are completely separate (from an SMTP point of view)

  • From: John Bittenbender
  • Date: Mon May 23 16:12:20 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jn7HztElE+WLE+0BzgVmqG2y5TOTjb13gKabQr5+dP3iQ6t6DIvomFKsqxwiNde10XJe5+YlX9y1qm1+I4YbFEGr+0UvkYX5JlhxQfLvetWYOiCeOvZo049zwpnM6aa3xKxJJqNWpGHvHbMDILIzSmiPEOwi8W/4tff85qIMW1s=
Steve,

   You can let your contact know that Verizon Wireless does have some
employees on the list and it's been taken care of. I've forwarded
Christ w/Globalstar's issues on to appropriate parties within VZW.

   As a reiteration, VZW's network infrastructure is completely
seperate from Verizon's. (with the exception of where they are a LEC)

JB


On 5/23/05, Steven J. Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> To get an answer on the VZW mail filtering issue, we'd have to talk to a
> mail admin at Verizon Wireless, as described by my acquaintance at Verizon
> Online.
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 09:45:00 -0500
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: Steve Sobol <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists]
> 
> Steve,
> 
>     Verizon Wireless is a completely different animal with no, repeat
> no, relation to VOL at any business or technical level other than being
> owned by the same mother ship.  That would definitely include SMTP or
> any other mail related protocols transiting my platforms.  I have no
> idea what kind of filters or block lists they use.  I will make some
> inquiries but don't hold your breath, they really are a seperate entity
> from the trenches perspective.  Please do not put my info on NANOG.  Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>