North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: soBGP deployment

  • From: Randy Bush
  • Date: Mon May 23 11:40:56 2005

my weak memory, it was due to a number of factors, some in the
database update workflow, some in the uneven usage workflow,
e.g. ans updating once, or was it twice, a week.

but this just underscores the difference here

  o with sbgp, the assertion of the validity of asn A announcing 
    prefix P to asn B is congruent with the bgp signaling itself,
    A merely signs the assertion in the bgp announcement.

  o with sobgp, the assertion is in an external database with
    issues such as
    - data correctness & completeness
    - data consistency
    - update frequency
    - granularity (bgp is per-prefix, and this is used by real
      folk to do traffic eng etc).  consider the mess of keeping
      this up to date and correct in a super irr.
    - etc

its the old simplicity vs complexity game yet again

randy