|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Running soBGP
On Thu, 19 May 2005, vijay gill wrote: > > If you are an operator, would you deploy soBGP or something like it? If > not, why not. > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/about/ac123/ac147/ac174/ac236/about_cisco_ipj_archive_article09186a00801c5a9b.html > > /vijay On a large network wouldn't this add overhaul being certs would have to be processed, possible slow things down. What happens if someone does some crafty route poisoning pretending to be a cert server sending all types of TLV options. I read into this before but didn't bother following up on RFC stuff. soBGP ... SBGP ... What about an entirely knew telekineticBGP where the other router just knows and bends its peer according to its will! =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo GPG Key ID 0x97B43D89 http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x97B43D89 To conquer the enemy without resorting to war is the most desirable. The highest form of generalship is to conquer the enemy by strategy." - Sun Tzu
|