|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocationITU v/s ICANN etc
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote: : > Probably, I'll have to research through the ITU site to find out this : > information, but surely these arguments have been presented to the ITU : > while they're making their choice of how to proceed with IP address : > allocation. : : and arguments were presented to bolton that his cuban/syrian/... agenda : was not supported by reality. did that change his agenda? : : the itu: bridge building across the digital divide by the same folk who : brought us the analog divide. and if you believe the'll do it, then i : have this bridge ... No, I don't believe they'll do it correctly. I was just wondering why they'd chose to do it the "national allocation" way when good arguments are presented that it'd only disrupt things. I thought they may have a good reason, but evidently it's just not true. It's just more bureaucratic ignorance of what is being legislated. I'll just start reading the site's info before resopnding further. I thought someone here might point me in a direction where I could get to the info faster. I replied to the list as IP addressing is so central to network operations and the 2 references were also posted here. I may have made a mistake. I know how these things slide off topic faster than a greased pig on a plastic sheet on a steep hillside. ;-) scott
|