|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical clarity
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:13:16AM -0700, Dragos Ruiu wrote: > On April 26, 2005 11:36 pm, [email protected] wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:38:00PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: > > > I think it's absurd. I expect my water delivery company not to add > > > polutants in transit. I expect my water production company to provide > > > clean water. > > > > er.. bad analogy warning... please take a sample of tap water to > > an independent lab for analysis... and find out just what the > > water company is putting into your water. > > Actually that _is_ a bad analogy. > > According to my sister (who works in that area as a regional water > expert), tap-water is held to higher standards than bottled water. > In Canada at least... ymmv. > > cheers, > --dr perhaps you mis-read. water companies -always- add things to water, to kill off germs, balance mineral content, etc.. they do this to -meet- the "higher" standards. and by their tampering, they pollute the water... their pollution may make the water drinkable and safe. does n ot change the fact that the water was tampered with. --bill
|