North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Tue Apr 26 23:25:20 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OAqBP7172fDVM4RUukQ0MllS0qlE3RGxILBswcYUxj6t80WicrKylkj1YPaEmiU33jxhfhcQrQsCo7RPrMBfLirH8aK82D7+eDSVJaRXw4U6KsAtelNO4Z8wh1i2Wi8OjBIaoSXJ+Gyv0knixIgl8hgSgeJYzZ0YZJV8kbt6754=
On 4/27/05, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I've been there -- I know how I feel about it -- but I'd love
> to know how ISP operations folk feel about this.
> 

He's right.  ISPs owe it to their users, if not to the rest of the
Internet community, to do this.
A lot of it is also part of the MAAWG bcps on spam (though the BCPs,
when implemented, will do a lot more good than just cut down on spam)

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])