North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Getting a BGP table in to a lab
Arnold Nipper wrote: On 21.04.2005 17:17 Reeves, Rob wroteFor what numbers? I've two quaggas, ~150 peers each, doing as-path and *full* prefix filtering for each peer (Config is around 9MB). CPU is idle 99.x% mostly ... Yea, but not 150 full feeds. With some full feeds flapping Quagga has a hard time. This is mostly due to poor scheduling of its poor internal multithred scheduler. Fortunatly the root cause has been identified and fixes are currently being discussed on the Quagga lists. Nontheless I prefer OpenBGPd because its internal design is made for many full feeds and it's parts run asynchonously from each other. The only missing thing there is full filtering capabilities which are under development currently. And of course that I pay the time for one of the OpenBGPd developers employed at my company. ;-) If you want to tip the jar too you are most welcome. -- Andre [Oppermann] [aka [email protected]] ( http://www.networx.ch )
|