North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Tue Apr 19 22:25:15 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rDT87gtUfGaoxN8/26AMOClA5s9c43uqQBRKaN5aXARgMibI308UTe+fs9WitcUrju+dXglRpmGQW6Cp/xbU+S/SPw5R/djkAnfNOdkMeo29NA/089DUbVRVip5RHQhqnKW/FYn5sov7Ry5m9eAIBxnLKz0NIviCMXf9K2XTDiQ=

On 4/20/05, Tom Vest <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 19, 2005, at 5:25 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
> > That makes very little sense to me since the smaller providers can get
> > a /22 directly from ARIN.
> 
> Sometimes resources that are come from a regional registry are not
> welcomed by a national operator. This can go for AS numbers as well as
> addresses. And sometimes a national operator is the only way out.

Not welcomed as in, filtered out / these providers refuse to route them?
Or do they kick up a fuss on the lines of "you should approach only
me, or failing that the LIR, for IPs, don't let me catch you running
to the RIR next time"

srs

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])