|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: AUP for NANOG?
I am new to this field and I joined here to learn more. I certainly have heard my share of bashing from linux forums. The more bashing I hear here the less I want to ask a question here. I'm not stupid but I am worried that one question might spark a rash of flames back at me. This is a newbies point of view. -- Scott Grayban Security/Abuse Engineer FCT Enterprises -- www.fctsupport.com On Thursday April 14 2005 09:14, Romain Komorn wrote: > > I'm at a bit of a loss trying to understand how bashing other lists > constitutes an improvement on bashing other members of the NANOG list. > > I think the point of Matthew's email was that no one really cares for > the bash fests, regardless of who it targets, be it on list, or off list. > > Personally, having joined NANOG a couple of months ago, I've been much > more taken aback by the amount of off topic griping about each other or > about whoever decides whatever somewhere, than I have been impressed by > the amount of useful information to be gleaned from people's posts. > > I hadn't ever really planned on joining the post list to be able to send > something to the list. I'm a little disappointed that my first urge to > post has come from being tired of off-topic rants more than wanting to > contribute something useful to the list. > > Romain Komorn > > Web Hosting Made Easy > http://www.Globat.com/ > > > Randy Bush wrote: > >>>This reminds me of the way others behaved when I entered the field > >>>some 25 years ago. Some people were very helpful and friendly. > >>>Others responded very arrogantly with the tone of "how stupid you > >>>are for asking that question." > >> > >>I didn't know you read [email protected] or [email protected] > >>... :) > > > > > > you wanna see bad second grade playground behavior, try the > > asterisk mailing list. > > > > randy > >
|