|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:53:26PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: > "Empirically" is because BIND9 attempts to detect other BIND9 servers, and > if it thinks the other server isn't BIND9, then it uses the traditional > protocol. So it will work so long as no implementation can fool BIND9 into > thinking the other server is BIND9, but then not implement the > non-standard protocol. Well, not to put too fine a point on it, Dean, why in he|| would you want to *do* something that silly? Since the only identifiable reason to pretend to be BIND9 *is to get that protocol modification*, if you can't do that protocol, and you claim to be BIND9 anyway, you seem to deserve what you get. Cheers, -- jr 'what was the subject of that sentence?' a -- Jay R. Ashworth [email protected] Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 If you can read this... thank a system administrator. Or two. --me
|