North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
if we still had moderation, i feel sure that i'd've been kicked off the list by now for my attention to needless detail in this hairy thread. "hit D now" > So, I guess I'm wondering.... how is what BIND9 does substantially > different than the case I've outlined above? the modem vendors you were referring to believed that they were extending the existing mo/dem specification. authors of BIND9 and tinydns each believe that they are implementing what's written in RFC 1035. so, different. -- Paul Vixie
|