|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
[email protected] (Niek) writes: > One could also put together a list based on: > - Security holes. in BIND9-- zero so far. > - Amount of code in BIND9-- % find . -name '*.[chyl]' -print | xargs wc -l | awk '{X+=$1} END {print X}' 687674 > - Bloatness in BIND9-- none. > - Seperation of functionality in BIND9-- you got me on this one, we have one daemon that does everything. > - # of seconds it takes to load huge amounts of zones in BIND9-- you got me on this one. in BIND9.3.1-- better but not good enough, BIND9.4 will be better still. > In the end, it all comes down to religion: no. > Bind people don't ack djb points and vice versa. i don't ack djb's existence, not merely his "points." i'm happy to ack your points, and debate them, though. -- Paul Vixie
|