|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Spam (un)blocking
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Daniel Senie > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 6:43 PM > To: JP Velders; Adam Jacob Muller > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Spam (un)blocking > > At 06:10 PM 4/6/2005, JP Velders wrote: > > >Over here in "RIPE land" so to speak, several ISP's (most > notably FIRST > >members) have put a lot of effort in getting 'IRT' objects in the > >RipeDB. > > And this is MUCH appreciated. When trying to figure out where > to send spam > complaints, a network that's taken the time to put their > abuse address in > their records certainly appears to at least care, and so gets > better treatment. "Better" != "good." In past experience, - Since the Abuse POC was "[email protected]" instead of "[email protected]" it wasn't acceptable. - Because "[email protected]" went to a 24x7 team, with an auto-responder, and (on advice of counsel and for scalability reasons) we did not reply to every complaint with a description of the action taken, it was assumed no action was taken. There's no pleasing some people, and it's a shame that not everyone can take the time to understand what filtering policies they're importing. YMMV Lee
|