North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Tue Mar 29 22:19:55 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=CUeZCbltGPW8qHR2aPRUL+zpl8OjjP1XWfkE+D8ELKw2DQOdmArXU/hGNmcMVJ1u2njHI/dWx8u9qR35QLnPn7QKNe/KuK4kQRJCpi9mi65zRcM80ku+vnU3a8F+Jd6AF/E0jSZqUg7LaYfMQVpRlHETvBscleriULsiInhpGvI=
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:24:52 -0500, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland
Maine <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> A summary of the report and a link to the full report can be found at:
> 
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-28mar05.htm
> 
> So now you know. VGRS, NS+, AF, ranked 1, 2, 3; DE and CORE ranked 4 & 5.
> 

I do believe that study is open to peer review?
Telcordia ranking VRSN way ahead does seem to be raising some hackles here

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])