|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: public accessible snmp devices?
Hmm, good idea. I add my voice to this question.
But, btw, SNMP implementations are extremely buggy. Last 2 examples from my
experience (with snmpstat system):
- I found Cisco which have packet countters (on interface) _decreased_
instead of _increased_ (but octet counters are _increased_);
- I have Cisco and interface, which do not report type if you ask it by
exact request, but you can read type by requesting 'snmpwalk' ('get next
variable');
- many many devices can be kicked down by SNMP packets (I kicked down Pix
firewall in one point, and few 6509 switches in other).
So, it is not so easy - to have such publickly available devices. I hear
about companies whho rent you network systems (just full network, not a
separae cisco or 3-com) for learning purposes; may be, use them?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vicky Rode" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 7:53 AM
Subject: public accessible snmp devices?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there,
>
> Just wondering if there are any pool of public accessible (read-only)
> snmp enabled devices that one can access for testing purposes (such as
> snmpwalk, polling devices via oid/mib, graphing chart..etc)?
>
> I'm looking for a pool of devices that I run my test on.
>
> Any pointers will be appreciated.
>
>
> regards,
> /virendra
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFCJzLfpbZvCIJx1bcRAqLcAJ95PzxXE4v51JgzTpeqfuEDZG6ibgCaAg20
> WJxjcsJYroHriTPr635QOBE=
> =SV3b
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|