North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: AOL scomp

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Wed Mar 02 17:12:53 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=N47jCU+IJhzx5iujEQmLvgsuxbWAqPXIZgmInJgY8VDnqb0ZAOW53oWLOncIA6YmcL1D4sF6RfuG+JxGl4GHAnBg66rx6YNXi1H5Z/ShI84MRwPhHY+EHLa1ejWRXkfXCYhBVLrHUwlDCp70lThh2UmJKrQ+J9kZfz2hshjDrfA=

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:15:51 -0500 (EST), Todd Vierling <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Your third option is best.  (Excuse the signature-pun.  :)
> 
> SRS does not require SPF, and provides auditability for forwarded mail:
> 
>     http://spf.pobox.com/srs.html
> 

In which case dont futz about with SES (thats yet another name for SRS
i think, I prefer to think I'm the only SRS around) - use BATV
instead.  Its  specced for exactly what #3 says.

srs

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])