|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Why do so few mail providers support Port 587?
On 02/19/05, Florian Weimer <[email protected]> wrote: > * Sean Donelan: > > > Yet another reason for supporting port 587 on your servers for remote > > authenticated mail submission from your users. If you don't support > > port 587, and use SPF, it may break when AOL or other providers re-direct > > port 25. > > > > http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/56437 > > Has AOL notified anyone in advance? Quite a few provider-independent > mail providers were caught by surprise. Is there a mailing list that will reach all/most of these provider-independent mail providers? (If so, then that's where we should be having this discussion asking why they don't support port 587 yet.) -- J.D. Falk uncertainty is only a virtue <[email protected]> when you don't know the answer yet
|