North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Fri Feb 18 11:43:44 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=VzvL9KaJYqsh3C+TNPj94QwCbSFCSMGRwLBaCowtNyO/jXaC4ChZRgFj55+FP3y6HGnan972n2AwzmrHL4TBvpX+yKjTCxe7sfLgHIvcftdLkXcw3gFw8FY8pPKcpENL+t0l/i7IS7kSAFMcxww8E19nMooQDhAnkKIpyVknd9M=
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:43:05 +0000, Alex Bligh <[email protected]> wrote:
> --On 18 February 2005 08:32 +0000 Simon Waters <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Whilst I can appreciate that Kornet may have issues with a lot of
> > broadband  users, but the other big Korean company seems to have it
> > solved. What I see  is what appear to be (using whois data!) US companies
> > buying transit from  them.
> 
> How are US companies with Korean offices meant to take connectivity
> then?

I think what Simon has been seeing is the Wholesalebandwidth AS

-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])