North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: ChinaNet Contacts

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Fri Feb 18 00:19:13 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=K+GQHiF9vX41V0xcNGtLkEnYVjD7MKe9drmh9YLDFrF9ruCr+XHNNKhBQ6lcJxRfzCg2Lmsg0WX0iaZ6BBoFR20E/QynhrLJ+VZR6UWKnvwS3U3b7VYt6NKp4uiuEyK9pRXFame9tukTi6ag8zQ6ISpdQXKYMCfwM4RX6gsEqvU=

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:48:40 -0800 (PST), Dan Hollis <[email protected]> wrote:
> From what I understand the answer is no. People I know who have attended
> asia-pacific regional network meetings described them as "clueless".
> Unfortunately the same goes for kornet. :-/

If anybody here is attending APRICOT 2005 in Kyoto this week, and is
interested in this issue, there'll be a bunch of chinanet people and I
think at least one guy from the Chinese CERT around in the security
and antispam tracks on 2/24

That's in addition to Dave Crocker, Jim Fenton etc as speakers :)

--srs
-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])