North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: The Cidr Report
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005, Frotzler, Florian wrote: > > > Recent Table History > > Date Prefixes CIDR Agg > > 04-02-05 151613 103143 > > 05-02-05 152142 103736 > > 06-02-05 152231 103721 > > 07-02-05 152353 103830 > > 08-02-05 152514 103966 > > 09-02-05 153855 104090 > > 10-02-05 154283 104246 > > 11-02-05 154341 104240 > <...> > > ~ +3000 routes in one week? Anyone else frightened by this? > > Florian any thoughts on how to fix it? my peers keep sending these to me and i'll even admit my customers do too. telling people its bad doesnt appear to have an effect, at the small end networks seem to collect /24s and announce them freely, at the large end i'm still without an explanation as to why large networks require so many prefixes - none of them seem to comment? if people arent self policing it seems the only other way is for the larger transit providers to stop accepting prefixes and telling their customers to fix their s**t. and i dont see them doing this. Steve
|