|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots?
I saw Martians this evening, just like the movie, but the country song didn't work. They -did- have big heads encased in glass. Go figure. -M --- Martin Hannigan [email protected] Verisign, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: North American Network Operators Group <[email protected]> Sent: Sun Jan 16 19:39:01 2005 Subject: Re: Association of Trustworthy Roots? Christopher L. Morrow wrote: >On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Chris Adams wrote: > > >>If the proper procedure was circumvented in the first place (which >>appears to be the case with panix.com), then it should be circumvented >>to repair the damage as fast as possible. >> >> > >If it can be proven to have been cicumvented, sure. I don't think anything >beyond conjecture about that has been said 'publicly' yet, has it? > > > Why yes, you must have missed the messages. The domain owner and ISP and registrar all clearly stated that they had received no notification, and had not approved the transfer. Notification and approval are required by the process. Therefore, it was proven to be circumvented. QED. Now, as to the actual mechanism of circumvention, that has not yet been revealed here. All we know is that a registry *supervisor* stopped the workers from finishing their investigation. Clearly, this .com registry operator is not trustworthy. -- William Allen Simpson Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
|