North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]

  • From: Owen DeLong
  • Date: Fri Jan 14 01:34:49 2005
That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.

Owen


--On Friday, January 14, 2005 10:05 +1100 Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:



What is wrong with MTAMARK?



	As currently described it doesn't fit well with RFC 2317
	style delegations.  They would need to be converted to use
	DNAME instead of CNAME which requires all the delegating
	servers to be upgraded to support DNAME.

	There are other issues but hear is not the correct place
	to debate them.




--
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.



Attachment:
pgp00015.pgp

Description: PGP signature