North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG

  • From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Date: Sat Dec 04 22:20:28 2004

Daniel Golding <[email protected]> wrote:

> The complaints concerning list moderation certainly have merit (no pun
> intended). There are wildly inconsistent moderation standards along with a
> growing fear of being banned from a wide variety of folks. The least

Well, for example, Randy seems to have been banned soon after he substituted
the more usual "North American Noise and Offtopic Gripes" with "ops sheep
willing to be censored by a non op" in a nanog post that was otherwise
operational in content (nanog thread "anycast stability experiment")

https://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/routing-wg/2004/msg00183.html

> The "if you don't like it, start your own" suggestion is not a bad idea.
> However, many folks in the community have an investment in NANOG, and, as

cf Bugtraq readers forking to start [email protected]?

	srs