North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda, yadda]

  • From: Scott Morris
  • Date: Tue Nov 30 19:44:23 2004 
Because then the specificity of the routes would become less relevant.  If
you have two highways available to you, then it's 6 of one and half dozen of
another.  You could care less which way you go.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Iljitsch van Beijnum
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 7:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: 'NANOG list'
Subject: Re: Sensible geographical addressing [Was: 16 vs 32 bit ASNs yadda,
yadda]


On 30-nov-04, at 23:32, Scott Morris wrote:

> At large NAP points (the higher order ISP's) this may make some sense 
> because of the ubiquity of larger scale lines.

Why would geographical aggregation need bigger lines?