North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Sensible geographical addressing

  • From: David Barak
  • Date: Tue Nov 30 10:36:20 2004
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=J+unOS0UVTTVZZySIyJBmoPcdB+StlXToyyjEE+dV+8p2oKXmfulRxJFIhBZtBfnk8vCWClu4ian7j8LGRstPrS/8YMjHGe3DQfIX2GJuEr24sXObQTlCIWBZxYvEHdvQ5wJTUQ4GNdJ0vq2vjCe8ifRlN1uBXcobBMQBpRki7A= ;
--- Peter Corlett <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> David Barak <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
> > What exactly would be so bad about taking a page
> from the PSTN and
> > using a country-code-like system? There are under
> 200 countries on
> > the whole planet, so that's not a huge number of
> bits...
> 
> Not that this avoids renumbering, as countries do
> occasionally split
> or merge. Sometimes there's also address space
> exhaustion within a
> country and renumbering is required.
> 
> (I am reminded of a Londoner whining about "loads"
> of number changes
> since 1990. In fact, there have been just three: 01
> -> 071/081 ->
> 0171/0181 -> 020.)
> 

But if the "country ID" bits were always in a defined
place, the pain of renumbering due to country
merge/split could be mitigated.  In any case,
countries don't split or merge THAT much.



=====
David Barak
-fully RFC 1925 compliant-


	
		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail