Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6

• From: Robert E.Seastrom
• Date: Mon Nov 29 23:35:21 2004

Tony Li <[email protected]> writes:

> My preferred solution at this point is for the UN to take over
> management of the entire Internet and for them to issue a policy of
> one prefix per country.  This will have all sorts of nasty downsides
> for national providers and folks that care about optimal routing, but
> it's the only way that I can see that will allow the Internet to
> continue to operate over the long term.

... and once the Internet's effectiveness and usefulness is dropped to
a level comparable to that of the IAEA, nobody will care anymore.
Presto, problem solved!

                                        ---Rob

• References:
  • Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Fred Baker
  • Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Paul Vixie
  • Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Leo Bicknell
  • Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Daniel Roesen
  • Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Daniel Senie
  • Re: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6 Tony Li

• Prev by Date: RE: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6
• Next by Date: RE: size of the routing table is a big deal, especially in IPv6
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical