North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

  • From: Joe Abley
  • Date: Mon Nov 29 14:27:45 2004

On 29 Nov 2004, at 13:50, Owen DeLong wrote:

Right... Well... The point of the loopback thingy was that you don't
renumber the loopback.
This is not any kind of answer to the problem of TCP session survivability across renumbering events; it's an answer to the non-problem of TCP session survivability when there are no renumbering events.

[how to suck eggs]
Joe