North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
- From: Petri Helenius
- Date: Mon Nov 29 14:13:56 2004
Paul Vixie wrote:
let me put that another way, in case it's not clear enough as stated:
tcp's existing reference to network addresses are a layering violation,
and so anything we do to improve the situation will also be a layering
violation, but what of it? deciding against making tcp "less pure" is
not going to meet the needs and demands of the community -- and those
needs and demands WILL be met, and probably in even less pure ways.
google for a product or feature called "3TCP" to see what i mean.
But doesn't HIP fix that in a way that is already specified and it just
needs to be pushed forward if the community feels it fixes the "next
generation TCP" issue?
Pete
|