North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
Paul Vixie wrote: Unfortunately this sounds like a good target for people to mess up implementations and introduce huge security issues into TCP stacks. (along the theme of the one which started the recent MD5 discussion)And please don't add any more layering violations. It makes implementorsi have long wished for and sometimes needed a way to renumber a host w/o But obviously, implemeted properly that would be very useful. The problem then becomes, how an ISP can signal a renumber. Pete
|