|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: A6/DNAME not needed for v6 renumbering [Re: who gets a /32 [Re:IPV6 renumbering painless?]]
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Pekka Savola wrote: > 6. Acknowledgments > [...] > Some took it on themselves to convince the authors that the concept > of network renumbering as a normal or frequent procedure is daft. [Note: check spell error - "draft" not "daft"] > Their comments, if they result in improved address management > practices in networks, may be the best contribution this note has to > offer. <sarcasm> Oh? Is that "Acknolidgement" the only contribution IETF has to offer in regards to renumbering? How pathetic! > To paraphrase Randy from a couple of years ago: 'Ocean: do not drain.' Is that the same as "Ocean: do not cross"? I guess we're lucky Columbus did not have same attitude to life as Randy... </sarcasm> -- William Leibzon Elan Networks [email protected]
|