North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

  • From: Paul Vixie
  • Date: Sun Nov 28 18:24:13 2004 
> > ..., it seems to me that MULTI6's only option is to make NAT work,
> > even if you call it "site local addressing" or even "ULA's".  ...
> 
> there are, and will be in the future, folks that WANT NAT, regardless of
> the perceived 'badness' of it...

i know.  i've met some.  i've been one.  please join me in trying to get
some of them onto the IAB so that, like prometheus, they can carry the
secret of fire to those in need.