North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2004-11-19, at 12.46, Jeroen Massar wrote: > On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:15 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: >> On 18-nov-04, at 18:02, Jeroen Massar wrote: >> >>> Larger enterprises probably consist of 200 'sites' already, eg >>> seperate >>> offices, locations etc. Thus they can, after becoming a LIR and >>> getting >>> an ASN, which most of the time they already have, easily get a /32. >> >> Jeroen, this is nonsense and you know it. > > It is not nonsense as long as 'multi6' doesn't have a solution to the > problem, but as politics go above getting solutions... I am not sure I follow you here? Multi6 in D.C decided to spin of the protocol work in a new WG under the Internet Area. I think that for the last few years, multi6 has moved forward as fast as anyone could ask. - - kurtis - / Co-chair multi6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQZ9b8qarNKXTPFCVEQLV2wCg+XtQqEH/oo0QjoT4a3LHag8YHlwAoP2I L/o/iD6ydT1aXpIz5xYR3MLO =s/g5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|