North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 09:29:25AM -0500, Christian Kuhtz wrote: > > > > On 11/15/04 12:18 AM, "Daniel Roesen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Unfortunate, even today there are not many option of transit ISPs > > who have a real native dual-stack deployment (I consider 6PE to be > > native)... most have just tunnels inside. Currently I cannot think > > of more than... hm... 3-4 ISPs who can deliver real amounts of > > native US-EU bandwidth. > > What sort of customers do these v6 SP's have for IPv6? What demands are > there for real amounts of IPv6 bandwidth? I've historically found that there are a number of FTP sites that get congested on IPv4 but are accessable via IPv6 (only). I have a /48 at home, but am only using about 4 /64's on my various subnets (servers, wireless, office lan, etc..) I'd say that about 1-5% of my home bandwidth usage (on average) is IPv6 only. I'm sure it's going up with the number of sites doing v4+v6 (eg: roots) increasing. - jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [email protected] clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
|