North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: anycast roots
- From: Hank Nussbacher
- Date: Sat Nov 13 13:56:56 2004
At 04:25 AM 13-11-04 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:00:54PM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > for those nodes that choose to use root-servers.org as a
> > publication method, ...
> >
>
> as far as i know, the root-servers.org web site is 100% accurate, and has
> 100% participation amongst root server operators wrt publishing accurate
> information. if bill knows otherwise, i'd like him to say so, and offer
> specifics both as to what information is not present, and where it can be
> found today, and where it can be found in the future.
>
> if bill is not actually aware of any missing information, i'd like him to
> say so, since it's possible to infer from his comments here that the web
> site is inaccurate or out-of-date in some way he's directly aware of, and
> i just don't think that's true.
> --
> Paul Vixie
please remove all public informtion about "B" from
http://www.root-servers.org. The public data about "B"
on that site is not 100% accurate and does not have 100%
participation
amoungst root-server operators wrt publishing accurate information.
For what purpose? Is B (ISI) is need of more secrecy than say G (US
DoD)? I always thought we strive for more transparency than for
less. Perhaps if ISI can't play nice like all the other roots, I am sure
there are many other organizations that would be happy to host B.
-Hank
plesae be apprised that your thinking here is inaccurate.
--bill
|