North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: The Cidr Report
At 02:47 PM 12-11-04 -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description > > AS18566 751 6 745 99.2% CVAD Covad Communications > AS4134 825 178 647 78.4% CHINANET-BACKBONE > No.31,Jin-rong Street > AS4323 794 223 571 71.9% TWTC Time Warner Telecom > AS6197 814 430 384 47.2% BNS-14 BellSouth Network > Solutions, Inc > AS22773 401 17 384 95.8% CXA Cox Communications Inc. > AS27364 413 45 368 89.1% ARMC Armstrong Cable Services > AS701 1230 884 346 28.1% UU UUNET Technologies, Inc. > AS22909 412 81 331 80.3% CMCS Comcast Cable > Communications, Inc. are these numbers what i think, but hope not, they are? e.g. is AS18566 the origin AS for 751 prefixes that could be collapsed to 6? Barry and me tried: http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/cidr.html Covad was first contacted Aug 2002: But Covad was just one. I used to quietly contact these "pollutors" along with a few others who helped out (Barry and Terry) but as of a year ago I'm giving my 5-10 hours of volunteerism per month to nsp-sec.ASnum NetsNow NetsCIDR NetGain % Gain Description AS18566 264 4 260 98.5% COVAD Covad Communications -Hank if not, then perhaps the report could use some work. if so, then o why are providers indulging is such extremely sick behavior o and who can hack the perl to generate filters for this so we can listen only to the aggregates randy
|