North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Network.Security wrote: > "Depending on putting devices on 1918 for security is dangerous. " - > Simon J. Lyall. > > Agreed. RFC 1918 is a good idea, it's not the law, and with that ISP's > are not required to do anything about 1918 addr's if they choose not to. > We receive a disturbingly large amount of traffic sourced from the 1918 ^^^^^^^ > > That's odd, I didn't think routing to Null0 (or equivalent) was all that > taxing, I don't want an ACL, I want it gone in the cheapest, fastest way > possible. that's odd... routing is a DESTINATION based problem, not a SOURCE based one.
|