North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update

  • From: Ted Hardie
  • Date: Thu Sep 23 19:30:32 2004


Note that draft-daigle-rfc954bis-01.txt was approved and is sitting in the RFC Editor's queue. It removes all of the policy language in RFC 954, but is otherwise the same (and it will likewise be issued as a Draft Standard, the current status of RFC 954). regards, Ted Hardie



At 6:00 PM -0400 9/23/04, Joe Abley wrote:
On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:36, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:

http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php

There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954.

RFC 954 is a description of how one whois service, "running on the SRI-NIC machine (26.0.0.73 or 10.0.0.51)". How can any other whois service be in violation of that?



Joe