North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [nanog] Re: APNIC Privacy of customer assignment records - implementation update
- From: Ted Hardie
- Date: Thu Sep 23 19:30:32 2004
Note that draft-daigle-rfc954bis-01.txt was approved and is
sitting in the RFC Editor's queue. It removes all of the policy
language in RFC 954, but is otherwise the same (and it
will likewise be issued as a Draft Standard, the current
status of RFC 954).
regards,
Ted Hardie
At 6:00 PM -0400 9/23/04, Joe Abley wrote:
On 23 Sep 2004, at 16:36, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
http://rfc-ignorant.org/policy-ipwhois.php
There you go. They do this, they're in violation of RFC 954.
RFC 954 is a description of how one whois service, "running on the
SRI-NIC machine (26.0.0.73 or 10.0.0.51)". How can any other whois
service be in violation of that?
Joe
|