|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: RIP in Operation
Oh certainly, RIPv2. I tend to just assume that "RIP" is generic and everyone means v2. - Robert On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 [email protected] wrote: > > We use RIP extensively on the edges of our network to build a Layer3 > > routed overlay between 3550/3750 switches and our 6500-based core. At > > $2k/list for the EMI license PER SWITCH ($4k for 3750s), it just wasn't > > feasible for us to use EMI just for OSPF when all we were really > > announcing was a loopback and a /30 connected network. > > > > We route filter and tune the RIP times down quite a bit. Meets our needs > > on the edges. > > I assume you mean RIPv2, ie. classless. With that caveat, I can certainly > see why RIP would be used. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] >
|