North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Email Complexes
Ross, There are a lot of knowledgeable people on this list [tier 3]. Why can't you already tell if you aren't getting through to major providers? Wouldn't your queues backup, or are you being blocked and the messages are being rejected and you are trying to track that? -M< -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Hosman, Ross Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 2:41 PM To: '[email protected]'; Roy Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: Email Complexes Your right this isn't my department and it's not my place to tell them how to do their job. If Roy would like to send me a valid abuse complaint I'll make sure to forward it on or even walk it over to the abuse department supervisor. I would also like to say I'm suprised at how many people have been attacking me on/off the list for asking a simple question. I'm just trying to ensure people are able to recieve/send mail from/to charter's mail complex. I didn't think asking for some help would be a big deal (as I thought there might be some people on the list from the companies that were knowledgeable instead of having to deal with typical tier-1 support). -----Original Message----- From: Paul Bradford [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:31 PM To: Roy Cc: Hosman, Ross; [email protected] Subject: RE: Email Complexes Come on... what is this.... Ross doesn't have the ability to put more "clueful" people in abuse, he's prolly an engineer like you and me.... we just want to fix the network.... why take this e-mail as a chance to bash Charter? Ease up, Paul On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 14:01, Roy wrote: > I suggest you concentrate some resources in your abuse department. One > charter IP address hit my firewall 1617 times so far today. Repeated > complaints to [email protected] just get ignored. > > According to the local newspaper, my fellow citizens consider Charter the > worst company in town. > > Roy
|