North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Rodney Joffe wrote: > On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > >> If you don't implement ripe-229, why not? > > > > because the golden address space stuff is stupid > > > > OK. I'll bite... > > Given Network A, which has "golden network" content behind it as described by > the RIPE paper (root and tld data), if the network has some combination of > events that result in all of their announcements to you being dampened by you, > your users can't get "there". For grin's, let's say we're talking about .foo, > one of the larger gtld's. But .foo is announced from 13 IPs globally, allowing for anycast probably 40 nodes. If gtld-A has an incident it may be a good thing to dampen it from the internet as it may not be reachable, the other 12 gtlds will be able to serve responses in a stable manner. Unless you're suggesting *all* the gtlds are flapping at once? Steve
|