|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178
On 2-sep-04, at 23:58, Randy Bush wrote: If you don't implement ripe-229, why not? because the golden address space stuff is stupid Maybe so, but the logic seems rather irrefutable: - as a rule, shorter prefixes are more important and/or more stable than long ones - so we dampen long prefixes more aggressively - the root DNS servers tend to live in long prefixes - so we exclude the root DNS prefixes But then again, dampening really doesn't buy you much as it only applies to routes that are flapping beyond the link to the next AS. So if you have an instable link somewhere, you can't dampen that instability away yourself.
|