North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Summary with further Question: Domain Name System protection
On Aug 17, 2004, at 12:31 AM, [email protected] wrote: 4. Anycast is the most scalable and standard solution for dispersed DNS server farm, while layer-4 switch could deal could do with centralized server farm;its not a standard.<ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc1546.txt>, aka _Host Anycasting Service_ Looks pretty standard to me.Nope. Its -INFORMATIONAL- e.g. Not a Standard. Ahhh, I see. Yeah, well, neither is HTTP for that matter. But most people would consider both of them pretty standard(ized?).Not to mention being used in production on several major networks for over half a decade (read: "forever") on the Internet is pretty well tested technology.true enough. but not "the most scaleable and standard solution" I'm perfectly happy for someone to quote even an _informational_ RFC as a "standard". Guess I'm weird. Sorry if everyone thinks differently. -- TTFN, patrick P.S. That would be "i.e.". If you are going to argue semantic points, you should get your grammar right. =)
|