North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: BGP-based blackholing/hijacking patented in Australia?
ok so then in the copyright let us see if can cover all variations of the original concept as belonging to the original author or author's as a test case for adaption and modificaiton to copyright law. I strongly believe in the protection of original idea's in reference to rfc's -Henry --- "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[email protected]> wrote: > one issue with that might be that the patents are > taken out on variations of the > core idea, imho the variations are not new ideas but > legally they seem to get > away with it > > Steve > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Henry Linneweh wrote: > > > Well if it will harm the community, would it be > possible to auto copyright > > rfc's, so that the authors of a concept can > prevent someone from sipping their > > effort off? > > > > Ignorance at the top doesn't mean we can't be like > always leading the > > way...... > > > > -Henry > > > > > > > > --- "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: > > > > > > > We have had running code for this since early > this > > > year, so depending on the > > > > date they filed, prior art exists well > documented. > > > (blueprints obviously > > > > predate running code) > > > > > > everyone has gone patent crazy, every time a new > > > concept is developed some > > > company applies for patent. is this the future > or > > > rfcs then? > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > >
|