North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Quick question about secondary addresses
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:21:06AM -0700, Dan Lockwood wrote: > I'm in a debate with a guy over the use of 'ip address x.x.x.x s.s.s.s > secondary' on Cisco gear. I seem to remember reading that the use of > secondary addresses is a bad idea, but I can't recall the details of > why. Process switched? No, traffic to hosts within a subnet configured as secondaries will be CEF switched. The only "bad" thing I can think of with secondaries, is that it's often not what you want, why not split it on layer 2 as well, and get the benefit of a smaller broadcast domain ? > Can anyone offer a resource or more specific information? /Jesper
|