North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Traffic Volume Manager ? (Previously: RE: Regional differences in P2P)

  • From: Hendrianto Muljawan
  • Date: Mon Jul 19 05:14:07 2004

 
Hello,

the discussion here is getting interesting for me, because people are
talking about not only capping the Bandwidth but also capping the volume
of the traffic sent by a customer.

So far people are used to do the capping of bandwidth with a Bandwidth
Manager device, which does traffic shaping based on e.g.
application/protocols, etc.

Now, since we are talking about capping on the volume, what is the
product available on the market which can do both bandwidth and volume
capping ?

thanks,
Muljawan



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Michel Py
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 3:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Regional differences in P2P


> Steinar Haug wrote:
> Telenor, the largest Norwegian service provider, capped their ADSL 
> customers at a ridiculously low 1 Gbyte/month for a while. Presumably 
> they lost sufficient business to other
> (uncapped) providers that they noticed - the cap has now been removed.

Ridiculous is the word here. Download two service packs and you're done
for the month? I can understand this happening in Brazil or India, where
caps are a tool to attract enough customers so they bring revenue that
in turn will be re-injected in much needed backbone upgrades, but in
Norway or the US it does not make a lot of sense to me.


>> Michel Py wrote:
>> I agree, but see above: a 40GB/mo cap is not something that I care 
>> about. Granted, I'm not a hardcore file swapper but 40GB/mo are more

> Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> I don't know of any capped service over here, nobody dares take the 
> first step. The largest 10meg provider here launched a new 100 meg 
> full duplex service for their approx 200.000 household reach at 
> USD$110 a month with a 300G cap (their 10 meg service for $45 a month 
> is uncapped) and there has been a fair amount of users complaining 
> about 300G not being nearly enough. When you start swapping DVDRs it 
> just isn't.

There is a need for capping 10 and 100 meg residential though; if you
want to run your 100 Mb/s pipe full all the time it represents 26TB per
month in each direction; you can't give 2/3rds of an OC-3 to a customer
for $110/mo. A 300GB/mo cap means that the customer is using their line
an average of 1.15%, which brings the interesting question of what a
reasonable speed/cap ration should be.

  1.5 Mb/s =    389 GB/mo
 10   Mb/s =  2.6   TB/mo
100   Mb/s = 26     TB/mo

Speed/cap ratios:
  1.5 Mb/s capped at   1 GB/mo = 0.25% ridiculous IMHO
 10   Mb/s capped at  40 GB/mo = 1.54%
100   Mb/s capped at 300 GB/mo = 1.15%

Thoughts, anyone?

Michel.